Tuesday, September 30, 2008

More idiocy from Palin...

I want to get back to the original point of my starting this blog by discussing the issues and giving my viewpoint on which candidate I agree with. I will do that more eventually, but probably as we get closer to the election date so it's fresh in the mind of anyone who's reading what I write. But there's been a lot else going on and I want to cover some of those things. Also, the VP debate is on Thursday and I can't WAIT to see how that goes.

In any case, more interesting links for you tonight...

- Here's a transcript of Sarah Palin talking to Katie Couric. This is a different interview from the one she did last week. Just read it. It's unbelievable some of the things she says and how little sense she makes at some times. Unreal. There are people out there who are comfortable with her being one seat away from the Presidency? http://thepage.time.com/palin-interview-on-cbs-evening-news/


- Here's some video of the above mentioned interview where Palin cannot tell Katie Couric what magazines or newspapers she reads to keep up with the issues: http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/

C'mon, people of America? Can you serious want to put her in the position to possibly be President?


- Here's an article that talks about how Palin is just not ready to be in the position that she's been put in. I couldn't agree more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1845116,00.html

- OK, enough making fun of Palin for now. She's an easy target.

Here's an article from Time about how frenetic and reactionary McCain has been: http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1845150,00.html

Compare this to Obama, who is generally reflective, contemplative, and thinks through a problem instead of just reacting. We need someone who considers options instead of just jumping into the fire like McCain does.

- Here's an article from Yahoo that talks about how Obama has been running some very negative ads about John McCain on the radio: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080930/pl_politico/14134;_ylt=AmhBPzF8mU0Hgdw4R5fyvktsnwcF

There's a few things mentioned in this article that I think are a little unfair to say about McCain and a few things that are fair enough. Here are a few things mentioned in those ads about McCain:

  • One ad says McCain is against abortion. I believe McCain's is Pro-life for the most part, but he does allow exceptions for special cases such as rape or incest.
  • Another ad says McCain is against stem cell research. I know this is wrong and McCain has stated he is for stem-cell research. This ad is misleading.
  • I've heard the ad mentioned here that talks about a Ferris wheel being built in Iraq. I've been pretty vocal about how I think we should get out of Iraq ASAP (responsibly, of course) so we can start spending the billions being spent there here. We all know McCain is pro-Iraq war.

- Here's an article where a commentator says McCain's picking of Palin for VP was fundamentally irresponsible. http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/americas/09/29/zakaria.sarah.palin/index.html

And people want to trust him to run the country?

- Here's an article that asks the question: Why should anyone trust Joe Biden?: http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/dominic-lawson-why-should-anyone-trust-joe-biden-946127.html

Why? Well, first, I'd feel much more comfortable with him being President than I would Palin. He's infinitely more qualified with decades of experience in our federal government. The gaffes the article points out are just some dumb mistakes he said not flat out lack of knowledge about what's going on in our country. Here's the things talked about:

  • 20 years ago he somewhat quoted someone else speech when running for President. He was barbecued for this because he didn't give proper credit to the original speaker. I can't believe such a big deal was made about this that he had to end his presidential bid at the time. This is so minor to me it's ridiculous.
  • He said while running for President last year that Obama was not ready to be President. Of course he did! He was his opponent! What would you expect him to say? He was trying to win for himself. I don't hold this against him.
  • Now this quote, I have more of a problem with:

    " I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy, I mean, that's a storybook, man."

    This was a less than... uh... a politically correct thing to say. I mean, this was pretty stupid. But, obviously Obama has overlooked it and it wasn't such a big deal as to cost him his Senate seat or anything. Do I like it? No.
  • He incorrectly said Franklin Roosevelt addressed people on TV during the Depression. Herbert Hoover was president then and TV wasn't used then. But I think this was just a mistake on his part. I don't think this would mean he was trying to deceive anyone or didn't know what he was talking about. This is history, man, not present day issues, where Biden has a lot of knowledge and Palin, so far, has shown she knows very little.

Biden has said some foolish things, but everyone does that at times and their not out there for public displays. People will see on Thursday that Biden knows the issues and can articulate on them proficiently. On the other hand, we have Palin who has said so many dumb, inarticulate things in the few interviews she has granted that it's ridiculous anyone can take her seriously at this point.

- I thought this was a great article from Arriana Huffington asking if McCain still thinks government is the problem following the collapse of Wall Street. This is a great read: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/does-mccain-still-agree-w_b_130417.html

- If you have a chance, check out http://www.youtube.com/user/TheYoungTurks. These guys love pointing out the ridiculousness of McCain and Palin and their exaggerations.

- This article talks about how Palin is even losing support in Alaska: http://www.adn.com/opinion/story/541124.html

- Finally, here's an article basically saying that McCain's gambles during this election are not paying off. This is a great read: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/mccains_gambles_not_paying_off.html

That's enough for tonight. Thanks for reading!

Monday, September 29, 2008

Taking a break tonight

Hi everyone.

I've had a very busy day and night so I'm taking a break tonight. I'm hoping tomorrow to get back to reviewing the issues. Have a good night.

Sunday, September 28, 2008

McCain the hypocrite...

Just a few things for tonight... I haven't had much time to look around and I've had a busy day...

- So McCain got all over Obama at the debate on Friday for his comments about how he would go into Pakistan to fight terrorism. McCain said you shouldn't say that. Well, apparently his running mate agrees with Obama as Sarah Palin was caught saying that she thinks we should go into Pakistan if we need to: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080928/ap_on_el_pr/palin_pakistan;_ylt=AqsQhvJQWgKVeg3e6SPcjntsnwcF

Of course, then McCain tried to spin it as if that wasn't really what she meant. Uh huh.

- Here's an article from the AP about Palin getting special favors and gifts as mayor of Wasilla: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PALIN_ETHICS?SITE=VARIT&SECTION=US

- I mentioned this before, but I feel like I'd be a hypocrite if I didn't point out this article from the Philadelphia Inquirer addressing a controversial ad that Obama ran in Spanish about McCain not being a friend to immigrants, which isn't true: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080928_Back_Channels__Obama_s_lowball_attacks.html

Saturday, September 27, 2008

So what was true from last night's debate...

According to factcheck.org, here's what was and wasn't true in the candidates statements at last night's debate:

  • Obama said McCain adviser Henry Kissinger backs talks with Iran “without preconditions,” but McCain disputed that. In fact, Kissinger did recently call for “high level” talks with Iran starting at the secretary of state level and said, “I do not believe that we can make conditions.” After the debate the McCain campaign issued a statement quoting Kissinger as saying he didn’t favor presidential talks with Iran.
  • Obama denied voting for a bill that called for increased taxes on “people” making as little as $42,000 a year, as McCain accused him of doing. McCain was right, though only for single taxpayers. A married couple would have had to make $83,000 to be affected by the vote, and anyway no such increase is in Obama’s tax plan.
  • McCain and Obama contradicted each other on what Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen said about troop withdrawals. Mullen said a time line for withdrawal could be “very dangerous” but was not talking specifically about “Obama’s plan,” as McCain maintained.
  • McCain tripped up on one of his signature issues – special appropriation “earmarks.” He said they had “tripled in the last five years,” when in fact they have decreased sharply.
    Obama claimed Iraq “has” a $79 billion surplus. It once was projected to be as high as that. It’s now down to less than $60 billion.
  • McCain repeated his overstated claim that the U.S. pays $700 billion a year for oil to hostile nations. Imports are running at about $536 billion this year, and a third of it comes from Canada, Mexico and the U.K.
  • Obama said 95 percent of “the American people” would see a tax cut under his proposal. The actual figure is 81 percent of households.
  • Obama mischaracterized an aspect of McCain’s health care plan, saying “employers” would be taxed on the value of health benefits provided to workers. Employers wouldn’t, but the workers would. McCain also would grant workers up to a $5,000 tax credit per family to cover health insurance.
  • McCain misrepresented Obama's plan by claiming he'd be "handing the health care system over to the federal government." Obama would expand some government programs but would allow people to keep their current plans or chose from private ones, as well.
  • McCain claimed Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower had drafted a letter of resignation from the Army to be sent in case the 1944 D-Day landing at Normandy turned out to be a failure. Ike prepared a letter taking responsibility, but he didn’t mention resigning.

You can read a full analysis of these claims here: http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_debate_no_1.html

The tally? By my count:

  • False statements by Obama: 5
  • False statements by McCain: 11
  • Call it a push: 3

Some interesting things from the analysis...

  • For all of McCain's bluster about earmarks, earmark spending is actually down.
  • Obama's tax cuts would help 95% of families with children, not people. The real number is actually 81% of Americans. Still, that's a high percentage.
  • McCain's health care plan would tax your health benefits. Right now Americans don't have to pay any taxes for their health care. Under McCain's plan you would, meaning even less take home pay. There is talk of a tax credit to offset this, but what if you have to pay more now than what you get back in a tax credit. I'm sorry for not remembering where I read it, but I did read that in the long run this would mean that Americans would have to pay more for health care because as health care costs rose, the tax credit would remain the same. Does that seem like a good idea to anyone? I don't think so.
  • McCain boasted that he killed a contract to Boeing, saving tax payers $6.8 billion. Of course, what he failed to mention was that the contract later when to EAD/Airbus. So read this paragraph:

    Further, the New York Times reported that "McCain’s top advisers, including a cochairman of his presidential campaign, were lobbyists for EADS. And Mr. McCain had written to the Defense Department, urging it to ignore a trade dispute between the United States and Europe over whether Airbus received improper subsidies." A liberal campaign finance group ran an ad hitting McCain on the connections back in July and our colleagues at PolitiFact found their attacks to be true, saying: "Center for Responsive Politics prepared a report for PolitiFact that backs [the charge] up. U.S. employees of EADS/Airbus have contributed $15,700 in this election cycle to McCain’s campaign."

    Interesting, huh? McCain has connections to Airbus and helped kill a contract for their rival!

Friday, September 26, 2008

Quick thoughts on the debate...

The first debate is now over. What did I think?

I actually think that both candidates did well for themselves. I give a slight edge to Obama because I think he got a few more zingers in on McCain and actually gave a few more points about how McCain has misjudged somethings, but I think McCain did a decent job of pointing out his experience advantage and how he thinks his policies are different and better than Obama's. I think it just comes down to what plan you like better.

I do think Obama looked more comfortable up there. He was engaging McCain, addressing him directly, and even looked into the camera a couple of times to address the country. McCain only ever looked at Jim Lehrer.

Some of my favorite points?...

  • When talking about the financial plan for the bailout, Obama said he's looking out for the middle-class. I hope everyone in the middle-class realizes that.
  • When Obama mentioned that 10 days before the whole financial crisis started, McCain said the economy is strong, Lehrer told him to say it to McCain, so Obama turned, looked at him, addressed him, and repeated the exact thing again. That was great. And there was nothing McCain could say about that because he did say it. Nice!
  • McCain now saying there are fundamental problems in the financial system when 2 weeks ago he was saying the fundamentals were strong. Eeek!
  • When McCain was saying Obama wants to implement $800 billion on new spending, Obama interrupted him to review what he wants to do. I loved that interruption.
  • I liked how neither candidate would say how they would cut the budget. They couldn't do it.
  • I loved it when Obama pointed out to McCain that he's voted with the Bush Administration 90% of the time over the past 8 years, approving their budget and spending, after McCain was complaining about the way spending has gotten out of control. I thought that was brilliant.
  • After McCain kept crowing about the troop surge in Iraq, Obama pointed out that was necessary after four years of mismanagement. He pointed out how McCain said the war would be quick and easy, we knew where the WMDs were, that we would be greeted as liberators, that there was no history of violence between Sunnis and Shiites... after making each of these statements, Obama pointed out that McCain was wrong. He he!
  • After McCain said he talked to a mother who lost her son in Iraq, she gave him a bracelet with her son's name and said that she didn't want him to have lost his life in vain, implying that leaving Iraq before the war is over would be doing so. Then Obama said he ALSO got a bracelet from another mother who lost her son who said she didn't want any other mother to go through what she was going through and that no US soldier ever dies in vain. I thought this was a draw but took some of the sting out of what McCain was saying.
  • I'll give this one to McCain... after Obama talked about not having preconditions for talking with Iran and said we'd tell them they they can't threaten Israel, McCain zinged him good, saying: "Let me get this straight... Ahmedinejad says were going to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and we say, no you're not?" I thought that was good.

Those were my favorite parts.

Let me say this about John McCain: he didn't embarrass himself like George Bush did in the debates 8 and 4 years ago. (I still don't understand how he got elected after those travesties.) I think he did a very good job in this debate and presented his positions well. I do think he's an honorable man, I think he'd do a very respectable job as president if he did win the election, but I just don't agree with his policies... or more that I'm in favor of Obama's positions. Plus I still cannot fathom Palin as VP and potentially President. That just cannot happen.

In any case, a very educational debate tonight. I think they both had strong performances, but I do give the slight advantage to Obama.

Good night, everyone!

Time for a Debate! ... My blog on Debate #1...

I was just watching 20/20 about Barack Obama and John McCain and I will say this... John McCain is an honorable, brave man. What he did while a POW was just amazing. But I don't agree with his politics, his constant changing of stances on the issues, his poor choice for VP, and that he should be elected President just because he served in the military. I think Obama is a more steady hand and is a much better choice to be our President.

In any case, here are my thoughts as we went along watching the debate... as I'm going along, I'm doing my best to summarize comments but they may not be 100% accurate... but they should be pretty darn close...

- 9:01: Jim Lehrer is giving his introduction and the instructions... I'm not a big fan of how structured these debates are. I think they should be a little more free form. Allow the candidates to interact and interject on each other. THEN you'll get a real feel for who they are.

Hey! McCain showed up! You can't see my eye rolling.

- 9:02: First question: Lehrer gave a quote I didn't catch. OH! But he's starting off strong with a question about the financial plan.

Obama first, giving his positions... nothing new for me, ... golden parachutes shouldn't be allowed... take care of homeowners... of course, what about he homeowners who did the right things and are still struggling?... Says he's looking out for the middle-class. EXACTLY! Good!

McCain's turn... talks about Ted Kennedy not doing well... that's sad... he's talking about the two Parties working together now ... Will he take sole credit for it at some point? The man who has said he doesn't know much about the economy and that it's strong?... Now he's given credit to the House Republicans for joining the effort... even though they're the ones that have been fighting it... and he just mentioned needing oil independence. I'm not sure what that has to do with the economic issues...

- 9:09: Asking about their feelings of the plan...

Obama first... asks the question: how did we get into this situation? He says he warned 2 years ago about the sub-prime mortgage problem... says the current framework where regulation is always bad is part of the problem.

McCain's saying he's not sure if he's going to vote for the plan. Now he's saying he warned about Fannie and Freddie. Uh huh... Now he's mentioned responsibility and Eisenhower ... how Dwight wrote two letters congratulating on D-Day and a resignation letter. Says we've lost accountability. No doubt! Greed and excess are rewarded. He says as President, people are going to be held accountable. Well, gee, they're trying to get that into this new economic package, so don't you think so?

Obama getting to rebut...

He agrees with McCain, but not only when there's a crisis. Mentions lowered salaries, health care, energy policies that don't work... he mentions McCain saying 10 days ago that the fundamentals of the economy are not sound and Lehrer tells him to say that to McCain... so he repeats it directly to McCain... McCain says her heard him... I love that.

- 9:14 PM: Lehrer directs the issue back to McCain. He says we have fundamental problems in the system. Didn't he says 10 days ago, as Obama point out, that the fundamentals are strong? HA! He says he has a fundamental belief in the strength of the American worker. He has a fundamental belief in the American system. But no solutions or possible comebacks at Obama on that topic.

- 9:16: What would you do to get us out of this crisis? McCain first... get Washington spending out of control. No kidding! Spending is ridiculous. No wonder there is a record deficit. He's talking about how gov't changed Republicans instead of the other way around. Talking about earmarks... He says he's going to kill all earmarks. YOU CAN'T! Some are needed.

Now he's mentioned Obama's earmark record. Apparently, according to McCain, Obama has requested over $900 mil in earmarks.

Obama says, yes, earmarks have been abused. Says he suspended his requests because of the abuse. Says McCain is proposing $300 billion in tax cuts for wealthiest people and companies. Says CEOs would get tax cuts under McCain's plan while his plan will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. AMEN!

McCain again. Says Obama suspended the earmark requests after he ran for President. Hits Obama for thinking $932 mil is not a lot of money. Says system has to be cleaned up and he has fought it through his career. Says Obama didn't mention $800 billion in new spending for programs.

Oooh! Obama interrupted him! Says he wants to be clear. He wants to close corporate loopholes that allow jobs to go overseas. Make sure we have health care for everyone to have basic coverage. Wants to go back to the original point. Says he'll make sure that he reviews how money is being spent on programs. Says can't just eliminate earmarks to help middle-class. Accuses McCain of helping the wealthy with his tax plan and neglecting the people who are struggling. Continues the Bush plan


--- I've had to pause the show a few times to catch up with my typing. Because of that, I'm going to leave the times out from now on. New topics or questions will have a dash on it.


- Lehrer asked McCain to explain his tax policies.

Talking about the business taxes. Says US businesses pay 2nd highest tax rate at 35%. Says Ireland's is much lower. Says he wants to cut the tax to create jobs. Says Obama is a recent covert to be against pork-barrel spending. Wants to give families tax credits to purchase health care... because that's so affordable!

Obama now making points. Talking directly to the camera. Says on paper, yes, taxes are high, but because of loopholes, that business actually have one of the LOWEST corporate tax rates in the world. But McCain doesn't want to close them. So effectively, he's making the taxes for businesses just lower.

Now he's talking about McCain's health plan... says McCain wants to tax health benefits. WHAT!?!? And if you lose your job, you lose your benefits and you have to buy your own. Says it's not a good deal for Americans.

Lehrer wants to move on, but McCain wants to bring up another topic. Talking about an energy bill. Says there were lots of breaks for oil companies. Says he voted against it and Obama voted for it. Says he's the one who has tried to keep spending under control. Says American have to choose if they want the existing tax code or a new one. A NEW ONE! Then he said that Obama voted to raise the taxes on people making less than $42K a year. Obama says that's just not true!

Obama's turn again... he says if he wants to talk about oil company profits, under McCain's plan, oil companies would get another $4 billion in tax cuts. Obama says he was opposed to those tax breaks.

- Back to Lehrer. What are you going to have to give up as far as priorities because of the financial rescue plan?

Obama says that's hard to anticipate because they don't know what the budget will be next year. But says we have to have priorities. Energy independence. Wants to have that in 10 years. Solar, wind, bio-diesel. Have to fix health care. Make sure we're investing in education. Science and technology. Make college affordable. Need to rebuild our infrastructure. Roads, broadband, electricity. Need to eliminate programs that don't work and others are more efficient.

McCain's turn... need to cut spending. Says Obama has the most liberal voting record in the Senate. Not sure that is true or not... opposes ethanol subsidies. Says defense costs are out of control. Need fix-cost contracts for defense spending. Says HE saved the taxpayers $6.8 billion by fighting a contract between Boeing and D.O.D. Says he knows how to do this because he's been involved for a long time.

- Lehrer says neither one of them are suggesting major changes.

Obama says things will be delayed... Lehrer says, like what? Says energy independence is a major project but that it can't be completely stopped. Says health insurance companies are skimming billions... Says he worked with a conservative Republican (Tom Coburn?) to setup a rulebook for gov't so taxpayers can see who's promoting spending projects.

- Lehrer says, what he's trying to get at is how the economic plan will effect their spending plans and what they'll change.

McCain suggests a spending freeze on everything but defense, veteran programs, and entitlement.. something... I didn't hear it.

Obama says the problem is that there are underfunded programs. Like early childhood education. He'd also like saving in Iraq. Says we need to bring war to a close.

McCain says we're sending money overseas even to countries that don't like us much and some of that money is ending up in the hands of terrorists. THEN DON'T SEND IT! He mentions other alternate fuel sources and that we need to start off-shore drilling. Suggesting nuclear power plants. Says it affects climate change as well as oil independence.

- Lehrer trying to represent the question... asking again how the financial plan will affect their Presidency.

Obama first... says if the plan works right and gov't makes money, that'll take time. He says he'll have to make tough decisions. Have to know what our values and priorities are. Says if we spend $300 billion in tax cuts for people who don't need or ask for them and leave out health care, then it's a bad decision.

McCain wants to make sure the health care system is not handed over to the gov't. Wants to make sure the plan choices are in the hands of families Says he's fought to cut spending. Says Obama has over $800 billion in new spending plans. Says a healthy economy without raising taxes is the best recipe to help the economy. Says spending restraint is vital. We owe China $500 billion. Says he's fought excessive spending his whole career.

Obama again... says to McCain that it's his President, who he voted with 90% of the time, who presided over the increase in spending and he voted for almost all of his budgets. THIS IS GREAT! And Obama says now McCain says he's going to lead on controlling spending and balancing tax cuts, when for the past 8 years that hasn't happened, it's hard to swallow. That's brilliant!

Now McCain. Says he's opposed spending, climate change, torture of prisoners, Guantanamo Bay, etc. Says he has a long record of being a Maverick.

Winner: Obama!

- New question: What are the lessons of Iraq?

McCain: You cannot have a failed strategy that will then cause you to near lose a conflict. Says we celebrated our initial success and then things were mishandled. Says he went to Iraq and said we need to change strategy. Says they came up with a new one that has succeeded. Says we'll come home with victory and honor. Says we'll see a stable ally in the region. Says if we lost, there would have been increased Iranian influence, more sectarian violence... says we're winning and will come home successful.

Obama says they have a fundamental difference here. Says he opposed the war 6 years ago. Says we didn't know the cost, exit strategy, foreign relations, didn't finish in Afghanistan. Says it would be a distraction. Says he was right. Says we've spent over $600 billion, lost thousands, says Al Qaida is stronger, we're still spending billions there every month. We're borrowing money overseas. Says the lesson to be drawn is we should not be hesitant to use military, but need to use it wisely.

McCain says next President doesn't have to decide if to go into Iraq. Says next President will have to decide when to leave. Says Obama said surge wouldn't work, .. would increase sectarian violence, said it was doomed to fail... he still says he'd decide against the surge today. Says Obama didn't go to Iraq for 900 days and is a chairman of a committee that oversights NATO for Afghanistan and has never had a hearing.

Obama again... says issues on Iraq and Afghanistan don't go through his sub-committee. Says troops have done a brilliant job. Says the surge was a tactic to clean up the damage of the previous four years of mismanagement. Says McCain said the war would be quick and easy, we knew where the WMDs were, that we would be greeted as liberators, that there was no history of violence between Sunnis and Shiites... after making each of these statements, Obama said McCain was wrong.. HA!... Obama says if the question is who is best equipped on how to use our military, we can see the judgements.

McCain says Obama doesn't know the difference between a tactic and a strategy. Now talking about troops re-upping. Says they said the want to win. Says Obama says refuses to acknowledge that we're winning in Iraq. Says the same strategy will be employed in Afghanistan. Now accuses Obama of voting against troop funding issue.

Obama says McCain opposed funding for troops because they had a time table. Says Obama opposed funding for troops without a timetable. Says Afghanistan is deteriorating. Says we rushed into Iraq. Says McCain says there was no threat there. Obama says we should end the war responsibility. Says in 16 months that we should be able to reduce troops. Says leaders in Afghanistan need more troops.

McCain... says Obama's plan is dangerous. Says both Gen. Patraeus and Bin Laden says Iraq is central. Says Obama wants to grab defeat from the jaws of victory by adapting his plan. Says it will widen the war. Including Afghanistan.

- New topic: Should more troops be sent to Afghanistan?

Obama first. Yes. Need to do it as quickly as possible. Says the situation is getting worse. Highest troop fatality since 2002. Would send 2 or 3 additional brigades. Says there was no Al Quaida in Iraq before we attacked. Need to press Afghan gov't. Need to deal with poppy trade. Need to deal with Pakistan because Taliban and Al Qaida have safe haven there and they don't do enough about it.

McCain now... won't repeat mistake he regrets. That we washed hands of Afghanistan when Russians left. Says he's not prepared to threaten Pakistan as Obama has done be saying he'd launch military strikes there. Says border areas have not been governed. Tribes run them. Says Obama doesn't understand new strategy there. We need their co-operation. Says terrorists do not want new Pakistani gov't to co-operate with us. Says it's not just troops that matter. Need new strategy. Says he would not publicly state that he would attack Pakistan... implying that Obama did say that.

Obama says he did not say he would attack in Pakistan. He says that if the US has Al Qaida in our sites and Pakistan is unable or unwilling to react, we should take them out. Says Presidents have to be prudent in what they say, but coming from McCain, who has threatened extinction for N Korea and singing songs about bombing Iran, he doesn't know how credible that it is. He thinks it's the right strategy. Says there are cross border attacks on our troops. Says we can take that or we can make decisions. Says we coddled Musharraf and alienated the Pakistani population because we supported a dictator and lost legitimacy there. Says that will change when he is President.

McCain says there was a failed state in Pakistan when Musharraf took over. Now talking about bombing Iran and his record... talking about the things he supported ... voted against Marines in Lebanon, where 300 died... supported 1st Gulf War... going into Bosnia to stop genocide... supported Kosovo and ethnic cleansing... Somalia... has a record of being involved in national security issues and sending military into harm's way. Says a Mother gave him a bracelet with her son's name on it and asked him to make sure his son's death in Iraq was not in vain. Says we'll win war and not come back in defeat.

Obama says he has a bracelet, too, and that mother asked him to make sure that other mothers don't have to go through what she's going through. Says no US soldier ever dies in vain. We honor all the service they provide. But the question is are we making good judgements on how to keep America safe? His original point was we took our eye off Afghanistan and who was responsible for 9/11. Says it's not true that McCain's been concerned about Afghanistan. Says McCain said we can muddle through there. Obama says you can't muddle through. Says he will take it seriously.

McCain says he thinks Obama should have gone to Afghanistan as sub-committee chairman. Says when he's sub-committee chairman for something, he would. Knock on Obama! Says he's visited these places and knows what our security requirements and needs are. Says we need a new strategy. Says if we suffer defeat in Iraq, which we will if we leave when Obama says we should, that it would have a calamitous affect on Afghanistan and American interests.

- Lehrer says they have had equal time, but the 5 minute intervals have gone over.

- New question: What is the threat from Iran?

McCain first: if Iran acquires nuclear weapons, it's a threat to Israel and that others in the region would feel they need to acquire them, too. Says the Russians are preventing action in the UN Security Council. Says he proposes league of democracy for countries with similar ideals. Says that could impose significant sanctions on Iran. Says Iran has lousy government. Says democracies around the world can affect Iran behaviour. Says they are after nuclear weapons. Says they are putting lethal IEDs in Iraq. Says Obama opposed amendment to declare Iranian National Guard as terrorist organization because it would be provocative.

Obama next... say ING is terrorist organization and said it consistantly. Says what has strengthened Iran is war in Iraq because they were enemies. Says they've since been able to develop nuclear program because of that. Says Iran cannot be nuclear. That threatens Israel and could start Middle East arms race. Says we need tougher sanctions but need Russia and China. Also need to engage in tough, direct diplomacy in Iran. Not talking does not punish them. It has accelerated their desire to get nuclear weapons and he'll change that.

Back to McCain... Says Obama said he's sit with other leaders without preconditions. Iran's leader (I'm not attempting his name) is espousing exterminating Iran and talking to them legitmizes their behaviour. McCain says he would not do that.

Obama again... he says Iran's leader is not most powerful person in Iraq but that he'd talk to anyone that would help keep America save. Says 5 recent Secretaries of State said that we should meet without preconditions. Says there's a difference between preconditions and preparation. Says it may not work with Iran. Says he was called naive when he said they need to explore contacts with Iran, but now Bush is doing something about that. Says we haven't done it, like in North Korea, they quadrupled their nuclear capacity, tested, and sent nuclear secrets to Syria. Says that lots of people says this is important, but McCain denies it. Says McCain said he would not meet with the PM of Spain (which is true) because he wasn't sure if they were aligned with us.

McCain's turn... says Henry Kissinger didn't say that. Says he said there could be lower level meetings. McCain says he's encouraged that. He says what Obama doesn't understand that if you don't set preconditions you legitimize their bad comments/thoughts, which is dangerous. Says North Koreans have broken every agreement they have agreed to. Says Obama's plan is dangerous.

Obama says that McCain is mischaracterizing his position. He says the idea is that we don't expect to solve every problem before talks. Says Bush recognizes this.

McCain mocking Obama's comments now: "Let me get this straight... Ahbejiminad (sp.) says were going to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth and we say, no you're not?" DANG!

Now there's a disagreement about what Kissinger would say. McCain says Kissinger would be interested in Obama's depiction of his views. He says he would not say that Presidential level should meet like that. Says Obama is parsing words. Obama says now, he's using words McCain's advisors use.

- New topic: Russia.

Obama says the Russian approach has to be reevaluated. Says they're a threat to stability in the region and their actions in Russia were unwarranted. Need unified alliance. Explain they cannot be a 21st Century superpower and act like that. Says Georgia and Ukraine should be allowed in NATO, if them meet requirements. Also cannot return to Cold War with Russia. Says they have lots of nukes and ability to make more. Have to deal with nuclear proliferation. You deal with Russia based on what our national security interests are, not by staring into their soul.

McCain's turn: Says Obama said both side should show restraint during Georgia conflict. Says that was naive. Says Obama didn't understand that Russia commited serious aggression against Georgia. Says Russia is KGB run. Says he doesn't believe we'll return to Cold War. Need to bolster friends and allies. Says former Russian countries are showing solidarity but are concerned about Russian threats. Says Russians ought to understand that we'll support Ukraine and Georgia in NATO. Russia is in violation of thier cease fire agreement by still being in Georgian territory. Says we want to work with Russians but they need to respect international boundaries and norms of international behaviour. Says this has a lot to do with Ukraine and we need to watch them.

Obama says that he thinks they mostly agree on this issue, except that he disagrees that the notion that he somehow that he did not forcefully disagree with the actions of Russia. Says he called for $1 billion to help Georgia, which they have gotten. Says we need to anticipate these problems. Said he warned the Administration in April that there were Russian peacekeepers in Georgia. About energy... says Putin is feeling powerful before of oil dollars. Says we need an energy strategy because of other, not-so-friendly countries. Says he has a plan for alternative energy choices. Says McCain voted 23 times against alternative energy choices.

McCain says Obama is against reprocessing and storing (of nuclear waste), which Obama denies.

- One more question... what do they think the likelihood of another 9/11 type attack?

McCain says it's less likely now than after 9/11. He thinks the nation is safer but a long way from safe. Says he and Joe Lieberman started a commission after 9/11 to investigate what happened and fix it. Says adminstration opposed that. But after familes came, they got the legislation passed. He says he got most of the suggestions from that commision into law. Says intelligent services must do better. Says we should never torture a prisoner again. Says we need to work more closely with our allies. He thinks American is safer but have a long way to go.

Obama's turn... he thinks we are safer in some ways. Airport security, potential targets... but a long way to go. Chemical sites, transit, ports need more work. But it's not a missle we need to worry about, it's a suitcase which is why nuclear proliferation is so important. Says we're spending billions on missle defense and we need that, but he also thinks that we need to spend more on nuclear proliferation. Also need to focus on Al Qaida. Can't focus just on Iraq. Need to focus on Afghanistan and Pakistan. Also need to change the way we are perceive in the world and need to improve our standing and improve our respect. Because of mistakes we have made we have to restore the sense that we are that shining beacon on a hill.

McCain... says Obama does not understand that if we fail in Iraq that it helps Al Qaida. Can't set a goal. Says Obama's plan of specific dates for withdrawal without certain ground conditions ... can't do that.

Obama... says for the last 8 years that the administration has been solely focused on Iraq. Says Bin Laden is still out there and Al Qaida is resurgent. Says were borrowing bilions from China. Says they hold a trillion dollars of our debt and China is active in Latin America, Asia and we are not because we've been focuse on Iraq. We have weakened our capacity to project power around the world because we have viewed everything through this single lens. Says we cannot invest in anything other than Iraq. Says Vets cannot get treatment. Says we're not talking about losing the war. Says next President needs broader vision.

McCain again... says he's been involved in every major security problem for the past 20 years. Says Obama doesn't have experience and Obama's made the wrong judgements in initial reaction to Georgian conflict. Says Obama is clinging to belief that Iraq surge did not work. Needs more flexibility. Says vets know he'll take care of them. Says he has ability and knowledge to keep country safe and secure. Says he doesn't need on the job training.

Obama closing... says his father came from Kenya and came to college here in the US becaue there was no other country on Earth where you could make it if you tried. Says our standing in the world now is not the same. Says what next President has to do is to send a message to the world that we will invest in education, how ordinary people are able to live out their dreams.

McCain... almost finished... says when he came back from Vietnam, he saw vets being treated badly. Says he'll heal the wounds of war.

THE END!

Next Thursday, the VP Debate!

Thursday, September 25, 2008

More links that you can shake a stick at!

OK, I've got lots of stuff to share tonight. This bailout, Palin finally talking, and McCain suspending his campaign has given us lots of things to talk about...



- First, here's Sarah Palin unable to tell Katie Couric any examples of how John McCain has been a reformer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RM72M62jAUc



Classic. Is she clueless or what? Are people really going to vote for McCain because of her? I can't for the life of me understand that...



- Here's Palin explaining to Couric her Russia/Alaska comments from her ABC interview. See if you can make any sense of what she said or how it really makes things any better. I don't think it does: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezxqgDDND6Q



Here's an article about it: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080926/ap_on_el_pr/palin;_ylt=ArhzSOh6JUyhXkTgS3EEaCpsnwcF



Her comments still don't make any sense and still don't contain any relevance to having foreign policy experience.



She talks about other topics, too, but reading her quotes... can this woman speak clearly? I don't think so.



- Those are some clips above from Palin's interview with Katie Couric. If you'd like to see the whole thing (and see Palin stumped some more), you can watch the whole broadcasted interview here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6c1oL5V_4U and here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQRGsZ0SN7E



Do you ever notice how she can't stay on the topic of the question being asked? Couric asks her in Part 2 about the bailout and Palin starts talking about health insurance and other things.



- Here's some great video from last night's Countdown with Keith Olberman, talking about McCain's erratic decisions lately: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZS7UBpwhRy8



- OK, one last video... also from Countdown with Keith Olberman, talking about Palin's "visits" with foreign dignitaries and how questions from the press were not allowed and questioning how's she going to handle Putin when she can't handle questions from the press: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A2745UjlLnw



Apparently at these meetings, she basically didn't say anything. Things like "Uh huh", "Good", and "Great". That's great leadership!



- Here's an article from Newsweek pointing out all of the lies, misinformation, and untruths coming out of both sides of the election: http://www.newsweek.com/id/160844



Seems to me that the more egregious distortions are coming from McCain.



- Here's an article from CNN critical of Palin not talking to reporters and not yet giving a press conference she's been nominated to be VP candidate for the Republicans: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/25/palin.media/index.html



This drives me mad. If the Republicans think she's worthy of being VP and potentially President, then why can't she deal with reporters? Are you really going to vote for this ticket?



- Here's an article that's very critical of McCain's decision to postpone his campaign, interject himself into the economic crisis, since he has no expertise, and saying he made his decisions in a "he did it foolishly, in a panicky fashion": http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/what_actually_happened_yesterd.html?xid=site-cnn-partner



- Here's an article saying both Democrats and even some Republicans were critical of McCain's decision to interject himself into the economic situation: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080925/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_s_gambit



- Here's an article that calls McCain's behaviour "erratic": http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/

- And, FINALLY, here's an article saying McCain's gambling with his political future... and it may be worth it: http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20080925/pl_politico/13920;_ylt=AhTKP1L0IBURkMFNi9Yhd5tsnwcF

He sure is gambling. Time will tell if it pays off.

OK, that's enough for now. Lots of good stuff here for you all. Enjoy!

Tomorrow night I'll be watching... whatever happens at the time the debate is supposed to take place. I'll be blogging about it. Whether McCain shows up or not, it should be interesting.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

A few thoughts on Bush's bailout speech

Just some quick thoughts on Bush's speech tonight...

Surprisingly I thought Bush came across pretty well. I think he presented a good case. He explained the problem, why it happened, and how they want to solve it. As much as I don't like this plan from the standpoint of public tax money being used to bailout private companies that mismanaged themselves, I understand the implications of not doing it. My problems is doing it right:
  • Making sure the money goes to the right places
  • Making sure regulations change to prevent this from happening again
  • Making sure that the people who put us in this position pay for their carelessness and get to just keep the millions of dollars they jumped ship with. Something HAS to be done about that.

From the way things were described, in the long run, we might actually make out AHEAD in this deal.

If the government buys up all the bad mortgages that are sinking these companies at low prices, the housing market recovers, house prices go up and are sold, then the money from those increased price sales might actually cut into the federal deficit. Wow! How'd that happen? Is it possible that Bush might actually do something successful before he leaves office? Of course, let's not forget that it was his administration's policies that put us in this position to begin with.

Anyway, I'm more open minded now. I don't like the idea of using taxpayers money to help wealthy companies recover from the dumb mistakes they made, but as long as reform is done, oversight is setup, and things are done the right way, this could, in the long run, be a very good thing.

Only time will tell.

Things that are bothering me tonight...

I haven't had a good day.

I can't tell you exactly why but I'm not in a good mood. It's probably an accumulation of things, but right now I'm just going to talk about things that are bothering me about the election, ...of course!

- First, there's John McCain saying that he's suspending his campaign and postponing the debate scheduled to take place on Friday.

I have a couple of problems with this.

First, I was really looking forward to finally seeing McCain and Obama debate for the first time to see what they really have to say about the issues. OK, that's a selfish reason.

But more importantly, this just stinks to me of grandstanding. It's like McCain is saying, "Look at me! I'm making myself look good to everyone by suspending my campaign and doing it before Obama does! Hey, everyone, I really do care! Country first!"

This is nothing more than a desperate ploy to win favor with voters. He's trying to make himself look good by making everyone think that he cares about this bailout. Even though he hasn't been in DC since April. Even though he's one of the people that helped get us in this situation by consistently being against regulation. And that's the way gullible people are going to look at it. Oh, look at that saint, McCain, being so selfless. What a crock! He's always been against bailouts. How is Obama and he getting involved in this going to help anything? If anything, it will probably make things worse because, if they do both get involved, their going to be working to prove themselves as leaders who can get things done their way instead of necessarily doing the right thing.

And what does this do to Obama? It puts him in a very difficult, unfair position. If he goes along with it, he looks like the fool for not being the one suggesting it or for giving in to what McCain wants. If he doesn't, then he looks like the bad guy who cares more about his campaign than what's going on in the nation's economy. This was the WRONG thing for McCain to do. He should have worked with Obama on this together, not by putting himself out there as the hero.

(I'm watching CNN right now (just after 8:00 PM) and they are saying that Obama actually called McCain FIRST about the bailout this morning and suggested they issues a joint statement about the crisis. McCain called him back, agreed, then 15 minutes later held a press conference where he basically threw Obama under the bus and told everyone he's suspending his campaign, they should cancel the debate, and go back to DC to help. He said they should both go back to Washington to deal with this issue. Why? What could they possibly do except bring Presidential politics into the bailout? This is so bad.)

So what do I think they should do? Keep themselves out of the problem. It's more important right now for them to move forward with the election and get out there how they are going deal with this problem and others when they get into office. If anything, they should keep the debate as planned and change the topic to the economy from foreign affairs. They don't need the candidates involved with this issue right now.

Obama says he's still planning going forward with the debate on Friday and showing up. I hope he does and McCain doesn't show up. That would give Obama the chance to address the nation by himself and present his views without anything coming from his opponent. It would give him a chance to shine.

This is such a terrible move by McCain. I mean, it's good PR for him, but just is not doing the right thing. A bad decision. Is this the type of decisions we can expect from him as President? Selfish ones? URGH! I just hope people don't fall for this.

Here's the story of how this came about: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26872907?GT1=43001

- I'm still watching CNN at about 8:30 PM and they are showing video of Paulson and President Bush saying months ago that we shouldn't bailout lenders and everything is fine. The economy is strong. Oh boy!

- Here's a great commentary from CNN's Campbell Brown saying the Republicans have to stop protecting Sarah Palin, calling it sexist treatment: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/24/campbell.brown.palin/index.html

Hallelujah! Stop protecting her! If you're going to put her up as a VP candidate, treat her like one! Let her be interviewed! Let her talk! Let us see if she actually has what it takes to be VP and potentially President!

- Even though the Bridge to Nowhere got killed, that didn't prevent Palin from letting millions of dollars from being spent to build a Road to Nowhere... a road to where the bridge was supposed to be even though it had already been cancelled. Does that make any sense? Is this the kind of waste we can expect from her? http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/24/palin.road.to.nowhere/index.html

- Here's an interesting story... Apparently you can't completely fault Palin for the Bridge to Nowhere. Obama and Joe Biden supported the funding for it... twice!... before it was finally killed. http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/23/biden.earmarks/index.html

I guess they can't keep getting on her for that any more!

The article also talks about how Joe Biden has taken and got a lot of earmarks for Delaware.

Look, not all earmarks are bad. Things that help people like creating jobs, infrastructure, community programs, veteran programs, etc, can be good things. But things like $400 million bridges to an island with 50 people and $1 million dollar face lifts for opera halls are not things that help the public at large. These are the types of things that need to stop. I can't fault politicians for trying to do good things for their states and getting earmarks to do so, but they need to be the right things, not things for private organizations or spending such large amounts on a small group of people. Stop wasteful spending!

- Here's a story that talks about all of the ... lack of truth in political ads.

http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1843796,00.html?xid=site-cnn-partner

My favorite part is this:

As of late September, with the two candidates virtually tied, Obama's mostly true to mostly false tally was 65 to 33, while McCain's was 47 to 51.

Can you see this? It SHOWS that McCain is being more dishonest in this campaign. Deception! Lies! Telling falsehoods to dupe you! Don't fall for it!

I got an email from Barack Obama!

OK, I'm sure this was a form letter and not personally to me, but I got this email from Barack Obama today about the bailout for Wall Street:

The era of greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street and in Washington has created a financial crisis as profound as any we have faced since the Great Depression.

Congress and the President are debating a bailout of our financial institutions with a price tag of $700 billion or more in taxpayer dollars. We cannot underestimate our responsibility in taking such an enormous step.

Whatever shape our recovery plan takes, it must be guided by core principles of fairness, balance, and responsibility to one another.

Please sign on to show your support for an economic recovery plan based on the following:

• No Golden Parachutes -- Taxpayer dollars should not be used to reward the irresponsible Wall Street executives who helmed this disaster.

• Main Street, Not Just Wall Street -- Any bailout plan must include a payback strategy for taxpayers who are footing the bill and aid to innocent homeowners who are facing foreclosure.

• Bipartisan Oversight -- The staggering amount of taxpayer money involved demands a bipartisan board to ensure accountability and oversight.

Show your support and encourage your friends and family to join you:

http://my.barackobama.com/ourplan

The failed economic policies and the same corrupt culture that led us into this mess will not help get us out of it. We need to get to work immediately on reforming the broken government -- and the broken politics -- that allowed this crisis to happen in the first place.

And we have to understand that a recovery package is just the beginning. We have a plan that will guarantee our long-term prosperity -- including tax cuts for 95 percent of families, an economic stimulus package that creates millions of new jobs and leads us towards energy independence, and health care that is affordable to every American.

It won't be easy. The kind of change we're looking for never is.

But if we work together and stand by these principles, we can get through this crisis and emerge a stronger nation.

Thank you,

Barack

How nice of him to think of me! ;)

In any case, the things he is talking about are very important. The American public should not be footing the bill on this by themselves. Please sign the petition, if you agree.

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Just call me Tarp Lazer

I just thought this was fun... The Sarah Palin Name Generator!

http://politsk.blogspot.com/2008/09/sarah_13.html

If you try this, post your name on the Comments. I'm curious to know what comes up.

The bailout

Here's tonight's links...

- John McCain has supported deregulation for almost his entire political career. But now that the economy is in the dumps and is the top issue of this election, he's decided that maybe deregulation isn't such a good idea after all and is conveniently switching his position: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/23/mccain.bailout/index.html

I can accept that people can change their mind on a topic when they discover new information and learn that what they thought before wasn't the best idea, but this just reeks of pandering to the voters. He knows he can't win this election by spewing his same old deregulation talk so he conveniently changes his position after all these decades. Don't be fooled! McCain has been one of de-regulation's strongest proponents for his entire Senatorial career. He's always been on the side of the wealthy and businesses at the expense of the middle-class. Now he's trying to win this election by saying anything. DON'T BE FOOLED!

- Here's another story from Time about the Bailout: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1843642,00.html?xid=site-cnn-partner

I'm assuming (or hoping) that the purpose of this bailout is to help stabilize our economy and save people's jobs. But it still makes me sick that the American public has to pay for the greedy behaviour and outright stupidity of these companies that are getting these bailouts. Why do we have to pay for their mistakes? Are these CEOs going to be forced to reimburse the massive bonuses or golden parachutes they got while running their companies into the ground? At the very least they should have to do that. I read the FBI is investigating all of these failing companies and hopefully something positive for the tax-payers of this country will come out of this.


- Remember this article and what the Republicans are doing right now with this bailout when you go to the polls Nov 4th. It talks about the poor middle-class people that are losing everything but not getting any government help: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26841602

Bailing out the rich... nice!

- This article talks about how Joe Biden has been saying things that are against Obama's policy plans: http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/23/biden-turns-on-the-gaffe-machine.aspx


C'mon Joe! Get with the program! Jeez! We can't have the VP Candidate saying things counter to what Obama's saying.

Monday, September 22, 2008

So I don't have a lot of time tonight for any in depth analysis tonight. But I do have a few links I want to share...

- At this link, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26761504, you'll find some very interesting reviews of the candidates plans on several different topics. I really want to go through these one by one and discuss their plans and what they mean. But you can take a look yourself and judge for yourself. The link will take you to the candidates' plans for health insurance but there are other links there for many other issues, as well.

- http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26831560 - This article talks about how Rick Davis, McCain's campaign manager, worked to defend Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac against stricter regulation. Isn't that interesting? The Republicans have been all over Obama's case for his possible relationship to Franklin Raines but this guy actually worked to prevent those two companies from being regulated.

- By the time you read this: http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/, it's possible the stories I'm referencing will be moved further down the list, but the first one is about Bill Clinton saying that the Dems should not attack Palin and recoginize she's a good choice for VP. Huh? I agree too much attention is being put on the VP candidate, but she's a good choice? I don't get that.

Two stories down from that there's a story that says Palin is accusing the Dems of attacking her family. But, of course, the story doesn't give specifics.

- Here's an article where Joe Biden says the ad mocking McCain about not being able to use a computer or email was "terrible": http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080923/ap_on_el_pr/biden_campaign_ad But then he does say given the tone of a lot of Republican ads, he doesn't think it's so bad.

- This article, http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5842629&page=1, talks about how McCain keeps making verbal gaffes and saying the wrong things when it comes to the economy and other issues and it could cost him in the long run. Let's hope so! It highlights how the economy, possibly the biggest issue in this election, is not McCain's strong point.

That's all for tonight. Thanks for reading!

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Palin, the backstabber

So I have a few more links to share with you tonight...

- This first one is very interesting: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0908/13650.html

The article basically talks about how Sarah Palin has turned against a good number of the people who have helped her get into the position she is in today. It really is an interesting read about the type of person he is. And it could be looked at in two ways: She's an honest person who came into office, saw things that were not kosher, and made sweeping changes to make things better.. or she a disloyal, power-hungry, self-centered, ambitious turncoat who looks for every opportunity to push herself and her agenda. Read the article and judge for yourself.

- I love this article: http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20080921_The_American_Debate__Populism_gone_wild__Palin_latest_example_of_push_to_mediocrity.html

It talks about how the Republicans seem to have a habit of elevating people into important positions and how are ill-qualified for them. Sound like anyone we know? I think it's brilliant.

- This article talks about how Joe Biden has been pretty much ignored... and that might be a good thing: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080921/news_lz1e21navarre.html

- One more for tonight, from the Chicago Tribune talking about Troopergate: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/chi-oped0921pagesep21,0,1329347.column

This one talks about how willing Palin was willing to be in the Troopergate investigation and how, after becoming the VP nominee, she suddenly changed her mind. It also talks about, if the McCain campaign is unwilling to be cooperative investigation, how can we trust what they would do once they get into office? It's more of what's wrong in Washington now.

- One other thing I wanted to mention... if you didn't get to watch on 60 Minutes tonight, they had interviews with both Obama and McCain. It's an interesting watch if you can find the time. You might be able to find it on CBS's website.

'Night everyone!

Saturday, September 20, 2008

Taking a break today

It's Saturday so I'm going to take a break today and spend some time with my family instead of posting any long messages. I do want to get back to going through the issue comparison on procon.org. I also do want to get on the candidates' websites and see their plans in their own words. I'll try to do that soon, but I do have more than a month. I'll get to it eventually.

Anyway, just a couple of links really quickly...

- So CNN got together five former Secretaries of State for an interview. Here is an article about it: http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/09/19/former-secretaries-of-state-to-next-president-get-over-it-get-real-be-smart/

The interesting thing for me was this quote from the article:

It’s time to engage Iran, the Secretaries said. Drop the preconditions and the political posturing. “The whole point is you try to … deal with countries that you have problems with.” said Madeleine Albright, who tried to pursue an opening with Iran when she was in office. From across the aisle, James Baker agreed. His advice to the next president: “You ought to engage.”

EXACTLY! The Republicans keep wanting to give preconditions to talk to some other countries. McCain has said he would do this. That's ludicrous. Dialogs need to be open. That's the only way to figure out what the issues are and resolve them. Enough posturing! Talk to these people! That's what Obama wants to do.

- Here's John McCain talking about deregulating Health Care, because that's worked SO WELL for banks: http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/09/the_truth_will_out.html

- One final link... here's an article talking about the race factor: http://news.yahoo.com/page/election-2008-political-pulse-obama-race

I personally find this very sad. It's the year 2008 and there are still people in this country who are going to judge a Presidential candidate based on stereotypes and prejudices. I would hope at this time in our country, in the 21st Century, that people could look past the color of his skin and see the depth of the man and what it is he wants to do. He's intelligent, articulate, confident, more than able to handle the job of President, and has a plan that will put this country back on the right track. If he loses this race because he is black, I think that's a very sad statement about our country. It would be shameful.

That's all for now.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Pointing out false statements about McCain...

Here's some links for you.

- So just so I can't be accused of only giving one side of the argument, apparently the Obama campaign put out a Spanish language ad in a few states that includes comments from Rush Limbaugh about immigration. It's ad designed to appeal to Latin voters for Obama by trying to point out a link between McCain and Limbaugh's anti-immigrant comments. Here's the link from Newsweek: http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/09/19/obama-fights-fire-with-fire-predictably-enough-that-whole-postpartisan-thing-was-never-going-to-work-out-was-it.aspx

Now, I have to say, this is inherently unfair to John McCain. McCain is for immigration reform and Limbaugh is against it. The two just don't mesh and this was not a good thing for the Democrats to do. And Limbaugh's comments were taken out of context. The article also states that Limbaugh is anti-McCain because of his immigration stances. So tying the two together was the wrong thing to do.

- The same article also talks about Obama's relationship with Franklin Raines. As I mentioned before, Raines was chief of Fannie Mae, which of course just collapsed. He's apparently been giving advice to Obama... maybe. The Obama camp denied this through spokesman Bill Burton, saying it was a lie. The article says it might be true but there was a Washington Post story that says that they have had communication. Neither Raines or Obama denied the story. McCain put an ad out pointing this out. This would seem not to be the best relationship: asking advice from the chief of a financial organization that has taken an historic tumble, to put it lightly. Not a good thing for the Dems.

- Another thing from that article: Obama's camp is saying McCain supports companies who ship jobs oversees. This is untrue. McCain wants to lower the tax rate for businesses to encourage them to bring jobs back to the US. The Dems are not saying this, just that he supports these companies, but not why so they are being deceptive here.

But I will also say that Obama has said he is considering this idea as well. You can find out more information about that from this article from the Wall Street Journal: http://www.wsj.com/public/article_print/SB121366164848479237.html

- The article also mentions that it has been said that McCain has flip-flopped on regulation. McCain has always said in the past that he was for less regulation. Now he's been calling for more regulation based on the banking crisis. The article points out that McCain did say at one point that "there is role for oversight"--especially in response to "the sub-prime lending crisis". The article states that statements like these are consistent with McCain's current rhetoric. So by Obama only pointing out his past statements, he's being one-sided.

I always believe a person is entitled to change their opinions so I'll give McCain this one. Hopefully he stays consistent with it, though.

There. It can't be said that I won't point out untruths put out there by the Democrats as well. However, as this article also points out the Democrats had to take this tactic because the Republicans were already doing this. If they hadn't, they'd lose the election. I'm not saying that to justify it, but just to point out that they were forced into a corner and had to come out swinging. They may at some point had to take this tactic anyway, maybe they wouldn't have, but they were forced into doing it because of the attacks of the Republicans

- I have time to share one more article...

It's this article from Time: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1841380,00.html

The funny thing about this article for me is that for all of McCain's talk about being against earmarks and how he's going to veto the first earmark that comes across his desk as President, this article shows that he's already telling people that there are certain cases where the earmarks are worthwhile and he would not deny the earmarks. He's been against some very worthwhile things that could have used an earmark. (See the article) The article also points out that as President, McCain would be hard pressed to deny every earmark. He just can't do it. So how can he run on a platform of saying earmarks = bad? They are needed in some form.

- I'm tired. It's 12:30 at night now. Hope you enjoy the reading!

About a response I got...

So I got a response to the email I sent out the other day that I wanted to address. Let's just say the sender didn't agree with me. This person made some points to me and I'd like to address them.



And just so everyone knows, I'm not doing this to point out this person for ridicule or to make him/her seem stupid. Not at all. They made some valid arguments from their point of view to counter my positions. I want to address the issues and give my thoughts, not point out that anything is wrong with this person's thoughts. That's my only intention. I very much appreciated the response, I'm very glad to have received it, and I'm happy now to give my thoughts on these points.



Here's basically what was said:



- I was basically told that the media is liberally biased because that's how they make money. They make money from their advertisers by "formulating and reporting stories that best attract views to watch the commercials and buy the products".



Why is it that conservatives always claim the media is liberally biased? I'm sorry, but I don't see it that way. I think that's an excuse and way of diverting away the attention from the truth that's being exposed. It's their way of covering up their poor plans: just say the media is biased instead of admitting the truth or taking the blame.



What, the media is reporting on what we are really doing and exposing the truth about our devious ways, untrue ads, and poor plans? Well, that's just media bias! It couldn't be that what we really are doing is not telling the truth and we're getting exposed for it! It couldn't be that we picked a poor VP candidate. No, it couldn't be that!



Sorry that I'm making some fun there. Just having a little fun. But I have a hard time with saying that the media is biased. I just see it as they report what's going on. I'm just not seeing any bias. If the reporting doesn't favor the conservative agenda, that's their own fault.



Also, just so everyone knows, I'm not just getting my information from one source. I'm checking many sources and trying to find even more. So if you know of any, please let me know by adding comments to my posts. I'd love to have more information and views from both sides.



- The comment that got me the most is that I was told that the Republicans did not say Obama was attacking Palin about the lipstick on a pig comment. That's just not true:


  • From CNN (http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/10/campaign.lipstick/): McCain spokesman Brian Rogers told CNN the campaign saw a "big difference" between the two references (meaning the way Obama used it and the fact that McCain used it several months ago): "McCain was referring to a policy proposal. Obama was referring to [Alaska] Gov. Sarah Palin. It's obviously disrespectful and offensive.

  • Also from the same CNN story: "Barack Obama's comments today are offensive and disgraceful. He owes Gov. Palin an apology," said Maria Comella, a McCain-Palin spokeswoman.

  • The Republicans had put out an ad saying that Obama called Palin a pig. I couldn’t find the actual ad because it was pulled, but I found this on youtube about the add being pulled: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhQSfdJ2Ie8

  • From ABC (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?id=5769091&page=1): "She is the only one of the four candidates for president, or the only vice presidential candidate who wears lipstick," said former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift, a member of the Palin Truth Squad. "I mean, it seemed to me a very gendered comment."

So there you go. The Republicans said it, including two of their spokespersons, and tried to put an ad out about but pulled it because CBS complained that they used Katie Couric in the ad. Any questions?


- I was told that both sides are running dirty campaigns. While I'm sure that there are things happening from the Democrats, too, that maybe I'm not aware of (and as I said, if anyone can offer me proof, please, send me the link) there are many more coming from the Republican side. Just check factcheck.org and you'll see many more McCain claims debunked than Obama.


- I actually was told some pretty interesting information about taxes. It basically came down to it's bad to tax businesses because that means they raise the prices of goods and services and lower benefits and salaries for employees. It's bad for consumers and employees to raise businesses taxes.


This has a concern of mine about the Obama plan and I could see how that could happen. But then I thought about it again: Right now we have the same plan McCain wants to use in place with the Bush tax cuts. And what's happening? The price of goods is going up, please are losing their jobs, health care is killing people, the economy is doing terribly... so how is keeping this plan in place going to make things any better? I guess there's always the possibility it could make things worse but if 90% of the people in this country are getting their money back and then using it to buy goods and services and giving it back to those companies, how can that be a bad thing?


The other thought I had about this: With the Bush plan in place, the basic same plan McCain wants to continue, we're doing very poorly. In the 90s, with Clinton's plan in place, companies and the economy were prospering. Now, I don't know exactly what Clinton's tax plan was (and if someone has that info and can give it to me, that would be great... just add a comment...) but I don't see how trying something differently can put us in any worse of a position than we are in right now.


Also, again, while I do have some slight concerns about raising taxes for businesses, there's no reason why wealthy consumers should not pay the same percentage in taxes as everyone else. And I'd like to see that happen.


- I was given one other comment about some news agencies (NBC) being owned by energy companies (GE) and to watch out. I really don't know what that has to do with anything. I really haven't gotten much of my info from NBC and only a little from MSNBC (mostly I go to Time, ABC, CNN, Fox News, factcheck.org, procon.org, and some other sources... also, of the candidate websites, I've only had time so far to check out John McCain's site briefly). I think that both candidates have energy positions that wouldn't necessary be liked by energy companies. If anything, I would think they would like McCain more since he seems to be pro-oil.


Anyway, that's what I was told and what I think about it. Let me know what you think.